Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Google open sourced Ajax tool kit



Google has open-sourced all of the code in the Google Web Toolkit and

invited non-Googlers to participate in the process, to the point of

publishing internal meeting notes.



The Google Web Toolkit is a tool to help Java programmers write Ajax style Web applications.

Google released some of the code to an open source project

earlier this year under the Apache 2.0 License. But on Tuesday, the

company announced that it will release all the code of the Google Web

Toolkit (GWT) and open the doors to outsiders interested in the

development process.



"We'll be discussing the GWT roadmap and all technical decisions

publicly, we've republished the GWT web site documentation under a

Creative Commons license, and, while we're at it, we'll be publishing

our team meeting notes to the contributors group," wrote Bruce Johnson, the tech lead in the project.





Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, December 08, 2006

ECMA said 'Yes' to MS Open XML

Ecma, an international organization that helps develop standards, has approved Office Open XML (OOXML), and will submit the standard for adoption under the International Standards Organization (ISO) process.

This is a significant milestone for Microsoft (Quote) because, if the standard is approved by ISO, it will deflect criticism that its software is not standards-based.

The standards issue is particularly important in dealing with governments which do not let their agencies purchase software that is not standards-based.

It would also give Microsoft a greater degree of control over how applications based on other platforms interoperate with its programs.





Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,



powered by performancing firefox

Forefox 3.0 Alfa 1

According to the Mozilla Wiki entry about Firefox 3, several enhancements are in development for the successor to Firefox 2, which was released less than two months ago. One new feature planned to be in the new browser is called "places", which takes a new approach to bookmarks and page history. Reportedly, these items will be transitioned to the left side of the browser, sort of like Internet Explorer 7.



Improvements to tabbed browsing will include the ability to move around and reorder tabs in a single browser, as well as a button right next to the last open tab that brings up a new tab, taking another page out of the IE7 list of features. Additionally, Firefox 3 will add the ability to receive automatic Firefox updates, like security updates.



Also, adding to a feature that was first shown in Firefox 2, version 3.0 will have increased session saving capabilities, including the ability to save all data logged in a single session, such as data entered into forms and posts, and the entire page viewing history. Resumable downloading will also be more easily available, and users have the option of whether or not to enable the session restoration prompt upon opening Firefox.



Since IE7, the first major release for IE since Firefox really began grabbing market share, the two browsers seem to be on a battle to take the best features from the competitor and add new enhancements to define itself as the best option.





Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,



powered by performancing firefox

Thursday, December 07, 2006

2006 Desktop Linux Survey Results

The results of DesktopLinux.com's 2006 Desktop Linux Market survey are in, and the votes are all tallied. This first article of a series offers a perspective on how the various desktop Linux distributions fared, and why.

Before jumping into what the survey of almost 15,000 Linux users revealed, though, I should point out a few things.



First, this is in no way, shape, or form a scientific survey. Anyone who wanted to vote could vote. We did make sure that we didn't have a Chicago-style election with multiple votes from one person -- or IP address, anyway -- but that was about it.



We also didn't include some mildly popular choices -- Arch Linux, GNOME's Epiphany Web browser, and the Fluxbox window manager -- in the initial version of survey. Our readers spoke early on, and we added them.



Still, when all is said and done, we do think that our survey does say some interesting things about the current state of desktop Linux. So, without further ado, here's what we found.



The most popular desktop of Linux today is... well, most of you can already guess without seeing the scores: Ubuntu.



Ubuntu, with 29.2 percent of the vote, has been the hottest community Linux since early 2005. While this Linux has had its problems lately, such as the update fiasco on August 21st and 22nd, users continue to download, install, and love it.



And, why not? It's an excellent distribution. It's not just users who think this; reviewers have also labeled it the Desktop Linux Champ.



A little closer peek at the data, and some comparison with the Distrowatch page hit list, reveals that "classic" Ubuntu with the GNOME interface is the real winner. Kubuntu, with its KDE desktop, and the educational Edubuntu distributions have their fans, but Ubuntu is what a plurality of Linux desktop users appear to be running today.



In a distant second place, with 12.2 percent, we find Ubuntu's ancestor, Debian. Close behind it, there's openSUSE with 10.1 percent of the users. If you included in openSUSE's totals its corporate big brother, Novell's SLED (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop) numbers, 2.9 percent, the SUSE-twins would be in second place with 13 percent.



After this, we come to what I think of as the first surprise in our survey. Gentoo took fourth place with a total of 9.6 percent. Gentoo, to me, is a Linux expert's Linux. I know many serious Linux users who work with Gentoo to better understand Linux, but almost no one who uses it as their first choice for day-to-day work.



In fifth place, we find Fedora, Red Hat's community distribution. Fedora, while still somewhat popular with 7 percent of the vote, seems to have lost some of its charm to users in the last year.



Mandriva, which used to be quite popular, is also no longer as attractive as it once was. Even though we included all its immediate ancestors -- Mandrake, Lycoris, and Connectiva -- in our count, it still only came in sixth with 4.8 percent of the vote.



Then, there were the others. These are the distributions that did, well, horribly in our survey. GoblinX, a Slackware-based distribution; Pie Box, a Red Hat clone; and Tomahawk, a Linux from Singapore -- none of these was able to muster enough votes to even creep up to 0.1 percent of use by our survey partipants.



GoblinX's poor showing surprised me. It's well-regarded, attractive, lightweight, and has a small, but active, development community. I really don't understand why it received so little support. No, it's certainly not a big name, but still, I'd expected to see it get some support.



Thinking of big names, Red Hat came in with a mere 2.2 percent of the vote. That's still better than Linspire (1 percent) and Xandros (0.8 percent) did, though.



What's happening here?



Well, if you take a look at which distributions did well, you'll see they have one thing in common: they're all community-based distributions. I think what we're seeing with our survey is that the people who've invested something of themselves in their Linux desktop are the ones voting. The people who simply use the Linux that's set in front of them, or just buy it, have less invested in it and so are less likely to vote.



I have no doubt, based on all the Linux desktops I've seen in use at tradeshows, homes, and offices, that while Ubuntu is number one, SLED and openSUSE are clearly the real number two in the number of users, with Linspire in third place.



I'd be willing to lay down a small bet that as Linspire's recent community Freespire release gathers more supporters, and based on what I've seen of the distro, it will be near the top in our next survey.



I also suspect that one reason why Fedora did so comparatively poorly is that Red Hat recently made it clear that the company, and not the community, is calling Fedora's shots. If the users and developers don't feel like they have a real say in what's going on with a distribution, they're not as likely to stick around.



Still, I'm sure that Red Hat, in the form of the older Red Hat 9 or RHEL WS (Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation) or Red Hat Desktop, is working on many business desktops. As for Xandros, I've seen it in too many places to think that it doesn't have a small, but significant, number of users.



However, without that community boost, I don't see either one doing well in our open survey. For a realistic look at how many people are using them, we'll need to wait for the IDGs and Gartners of the world to do a CIO/CTO survey of business Linux desktop use. Come that day, I suspect we'll find RHEL WS and SLED neck and neck.



For now, though, what I can say with perfect assurance is that Ubuntu is the number one desktop Linux distro, and that the community Linuxes are far more popular with our readers than their commercial brothers.



In my next look at our survey results, I'll talk about what desktop interfaces and applications are favored by our Linux desktop readers. There won't be any surprises at who's on top, but I think you will be surprised by the ones that are closest to catching up with the big names.





Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,



powered by performancing firefox

Linux Desktop Survey

Analysis -- The OSDL's Desktop Working Group recently concluded a survey on what areas of development are most important to desktop Linux users. The results, now in, will be put to immediate use at the next Desktop Architects Meeting this week in Portland.



The Working Group's survey, while touching on consumer issues, such as iPod support, was focused primarily on business use. Besides general questions -- "How many desktop systems does your company use?" -- the OSDL wanted to know such specifics as what peripheral equipment needs to work with your Linux desktops.



The top desktop priorities that users want developers to work on are, in order of importance: open-source drivers, cross-distribution Linux desktop standards, and improved wireless support.



While the Desktop Working Group has gone a long way with the community desktop architects in addressing desktop standards with the Portland Project standards, the related driver and wireless problems are far more intractable.



As John Cherry, the OSDL's (Open Source Development Labs) Desktop Linux initiative manager, observed in a note concerning the survey, there are only four real answers to the driver problem, and none of them are perfect.



The first is to increase the visibility of the problem so that the vendors will start supplying open-source drivers. Cherry, however, thinks that Linux's driver problems are already about as well known as they can be.



The second is reverse engineering. But, Cherry said, "The main downside to this is that it's a lot of tedious work. However, it's been a time-proven solution, and is entirely within the control of the community. So the best way to apply resources here would be to either a) increase the amount of workers, or b) make the work easier to do."



The third approach, according to Cherry, is to continue to create wrappers around Windows drivers, such as the NDISWrapper project. This open-source project uses NDIS (Network Driver Interface Specification) and native Windows drivers to support wireless network cards on Linux. This method, though, "has already been ruled out by the community, so I think it'd be much less likely to be accepted," he notes.



Finally, Cherry suggests that the open-source community directly approach vendors about obtaining support for open drivers. It is, he admits, a long shot since most of them already know about the demand for open-source drivers and have largely dismissed the idea. Still, he thinks it may be worth a shot.



The information gathered in this survey will be put to immediate use at the next OSDL Desktop Architects Meeting in Portland, Oregon on Dec. 7 and 8. It was at this meeting last year that the revolutionary Portland Project and its technical summits on printing, wireless, and power management began.



These efforts, in turn, have led to breakthroughs in making the Linux desktop far more user and developer friendly. Hopefully, the latest survey's results and this week's meeting will lead to new breakthroughs in desktop Linux usability, and who knows, perhaps a path to significant improvements in Linux driver support.





Technorati Tags: , , , ,



powered by performancing firefox

Monday, December 04, 2006

Digg founder on Apple iPhone

According to Rose, the extremely compact device will work with both CDMA
and GSM networks, making it compatible with all of the most popular
wireless carriers, such as Verizon, Sprint, Cingular and T-Mobile.





Apple is also doing "some unique things" with the device, he said, like
building in two separate batteries -- one for the music player portion
and the other for the actual phone.





Rose, who has provided accurate information on Apple products in the
past, added that Apple is likely to introduce two models of the phone:
a $249 4GB model and a $449 8GB model.





It should be noted that his past predictions on Apple products have
come within hours, not months, of the formal introduction for those
products.





Still, Rose appeared high in his convictions, even adding that a
touch-screen may also be in the cards for the face of the device.



powered by performancing firefox

Saturday, December 02, 2006

Will Vista Be a Boon for Linux?

As enterprises of all stripes and sizes ponder whether or when to upgrade to Windows Vista, they could be confronted with at least three choices.



1) Stay with what they have

2) Migrate to Vista

3) Migrate to Linux



Some of the thinking goes like this:



Vista is a remarkable step forward for many Windows users. It offers a much more sophisticated set of security technologies and default configurations than Windows XP does, even with the security features XP provided with Service Pack 2. Vista attempts to solve the complicated patchwork of bug fixes and workarounds in Window XP SP2. For security reasons alone, Vista is likely to tempt many IT administrators to recommend an upgrade. Vista is also loaded with eye-candy, an improved desktop UI and, let's not forget, a full-fledged media center.



But Vista has higher hardware requirements than its predecessors, which are likely to be a barrier to many companies with older hardware and budgets that don't allow for capital expenditures on new PCs just to run Vista. Let's not forget that Vista itself has a price tag to go with that upgrade decision.



So does this make a case to consider Linux?



Linux has a track record of being more secure compared to Windows. In many cases, Linux is cheaper to deploy and may well also run with lower hardware requirements than Vista's. But it's not that easy, either.



Application availability is the issue for corporate desktops running Linux, such as with Office Suite and collaboration applications. However, since Windows XP launched, Linux has made strides with application availability.



On the collaboration side, for example, it's now possible to run Lotus Notes on Linux. Zimbra also makes a collaboration suite that is as good as it gets.



But if an enterprise were to migrate to Linux desktops with OpenOffice.org (OOo) as their productivity suite, many users would be challenged by their legacy Microsoft Office files that do not convert OOo files simply or accurately 100 percent of the time. However, the recent Microsoft Novell interoperability agreement may address this issue. Plus, as browser-accessible AJAX applications improve, so does application availability on Linux.



Enterprises may also consider running Windows-based applications on Linux, which is the approach that Linux vendor Xandros offers. Xandros includes the CrossOver Linux suite developed by CodeWeavers on a Linux desktop. CrossOver enables many Windows applications to be run on Linux without the need for users to purchase a separate Windows OS license.



Vista is a much improved UI than XP. But Linux is angling in the beauty department as well.



Take the Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10, which rivals Vista in terms of user interface innovations and whiz-bang-pop transitions and effects. The 3D cube desktop display still blows my mind ever time I see it.



But Novell's got more than Vista to compete with. Its chief Linux rival, Red Hat, is still a few months away from rolling out its latest nterprise desktop release. This will up the ante for the Linux desktop.



Plus, Red Hat Enterprise Desktop 5 will be out at a time when Vista is on the minds of many IT administrators. No doubt, Red Hat will do its best to make sure let admins know they have another choice. It remains to be seen whether Oracle's Unbreakable Linux (which is based on Red Hat) will be offered in a desktop version or server only. Only Oracle's Larry Ellison knows, and he's no great fan of Microsoft. If Oracle enters the desktop fray it will only add even marketing muscle to the Linux desktop decision for enterprises. (Even Ubuntu, with its five years of support for its Dapper Drake Linux version, could play itself up as a cheaper alternative.)



So what do enterprises do? They might stick with their first choice and stay with whatever they have, which is likely to be the leading choice for many since it represents the path of least resistance. But as Vista proliferates, I suspect that many will come to the conclusion that the older versions of Windows they are still running represent a risk that can be avoided by migrating.



More so than ever before, the question for enterprises will be, to migrate to Vista or to give Linux a chance?



powered by performancing firefox